Table 4. Awareness of and participation in GBV community interventions.
| Percent of survey respondents who: | Follow-up | Estimated Odds Ratio (intervention relative to control arm) |
95% CI | p valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | ||||
| Percent | Percent | ||||
| Freq/N | Freq/N | ||||
| Heard about the WRP/HJFMRI GBV program | 47.7% | 19.6% | 3.96 | 2.34–6.69 | <0.001 |
| 298/625 | 122/624 | ||||
| Participated in a launch of the WRP/HJFMRI GBV program | 4.6% | 0.8% | 6.08 | 1.67–22.19 | 0.006 |
| 29/625 | 5/624 | ||||
| Aware of current or recent GBV media programs | 55.9% | 46.2% | 1.5 | 0.92–2.46 | 0.106 |
| 348/622 | 288/623 | ||||
| Mentioned awareness of AMKA SASA media campaign | 12.2% | 4.3% | 3.29 | 1.02–10.6 | 0.046 |
| 76/623 | 27/623 | ||||
| Participated in community dialogues on GBV | 23.6% | 12.5% | 2.18 | 1.40–3.41 | <0.001 |
| 147/622 | 78/624 | ||||
| Participated in one or more GBV group education sessions | 14.3% | 4.7% | 3.54 | 1.65–7.59 | 0.002 |
| 89/622 | 29/623 | ||||
| Participated in CoupleConnect | 5.6% | 1.3% | 5.50 | 0.65–46.4 | 0.116 |
| 35/621 | 8/621 | ||||
a p values are based on a GLMM with cluster treated as a random effect.