. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0206074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206074

Table 6. Acceptance of IPV.

	Baseline		Follow-up		Odds-ratio of follow-up to baseline prevalence among control clusters (time effect)			Odds-ratio of intervention to control clusters prevalence at follow-up (intervention effect)
	Interv’n	Control	Interv’n	Control	Est. OR	95% CI	p value^a	Est. OR	95% CI	p value^a
	Percent	Percent	Percent	Percent
	Freq/N	Freq/N	Freq/N	Freq/N
Prevalence of reported acceptance of a husband hitting or beating his wife in the following situations:
She neglects the children	53.4	51.0	41.8	45.5	0.78	0.63–0.97	0.028	0.81	0.60–1.09	0.170
She neglects the children	350/656	328/643	261/625	284/624	0.78	0.63–0.97	0.028	0.81	0.60–1.09	0.170
She argues with her partner	44.7	41.1	29.3	32.7	0.66	0.53–0.84	<0.001	0.79	0.57–1.08	0.136
She argues with her partner	293/656	264/643	183/625	204/624	0.66	0.53–0.84	<0.001	0.79	0.57–1.08	0.136
She goes out without telling her partner	37.3	35.8	27.7	29.5	0.73	0.57–0.92	0.008	0.89	0.65–1.24	0.500
She goes out without telling her partner	245/656	230/643	173/625	184/624	0.73	0.57–0.92	0.008	0.89	0.65–1.24	0.500
She refuses to have sex with her partner	35.4	27.4	21.0	23.7	0.78	0.61–1.00	0.048	0.65	0.46–0.91	0.014
She refuses to have sex with her partner	232/656	176/643	131/625	148/624	0.78	0.61–1.00	0.048	0.65	0.46–0.91	0.014
She burns the food	20.0	20.4	13.6	15.1	0.67	0.50–0.90	0.006	0.94	0.64–1.40	0.770
She burns the food	131/656	131/643	85/625	94/624	0.67	0.50–0.90	0.006	0.94	0.64–1.40	0.770

^a p values are based on a GLMM with cluster-specific baseline prevalence equal to the true baseline prevalence plus a random effect for all clusters including those randomized to the intervention.