Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208637

Table 2. Summary of the meta-analysis depicting the association between dosimetric factors and risk of RP≥ grade 2 after SBRT in lung cancer.

Dose-volume parameters Studies (n) Statistical method Heterogeneity Effect Estimate
P I2 (%)
Age 4 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.00 0 -0.25 [-6.15, 5.65]
PTV 5 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.46 0 27.71 [14.43, 40.99]
MLD 3 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.004 81 4.79 [1.28, 8.30]
Total MLD 5 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.83 0 1.66 [0.99, 2.33]
V5 4 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.74 0 13.44 [7.50, 19.39]
V10 4 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.92 0 8.58 [5.50, 11.66]
V20 4 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.88 0 4.56 [3.07, 6.04]
V40 3 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.18 41 1.06 [0.56, 1.55]
PTV: ≤145 cc vs. >145 cc 4 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 0 2.85 [2.70, 3.01]
Total MLD: <4.70 Gy vs. ≥4.70 Gy 4 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.54 0 4.01 [3.01, 5.33]
V5: <26.80% vs. ≥26.80% 4 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.4 0 5.05 [2.92, 8.74]
V10: ≤12% vs. >12% 4 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.27 24 4.42 [2.49, 7.84]
V20: <5.80% vs. ≥5.80% 3 Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.48 0 5.22 [2.47, 10.99]