Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2018 Oct 30;526(18):3058–3065. doi: 10.1002/cne.24533

Figure 3. Genetic disruption of peripheral target innervation does not affect region-specific central arbor morphologies.

Figure 3.

A, C, Whole mount CFP immunostaining of sparse labeled 2–3pw MrgprdCreERT2; Retf(CFP) / + (control, A) and MrgprdCreERT2; Retf(CFP) / null (mutant, C) DRGs (0.5 mg tamoxifen at E16.5-E17.5). B, D, CFP immunostaining of sectioned glabrous skin shows epidermal endings in control (B) but not mutant (D) mice, indicating a lack of peripheral terminals in Ret null nociceptors. White arrows, mature epidermal endings. White arrowheads, dermal axonal bundles. E-H, CFP immunostaining of serial DH sections from control (E&F) and mutant (G&H) mice shows sparse labeled terminals. I, Quantification of the number of CFP+ neurons / DRG. n = 14–22 DRGs from 3 animals per genotype. J, Maximal mediolateral width of sparse labeled neurons from control and mutant mice shows that the round-vs.-long distinction is still present in mutant mice. n = 239 (mutant), 287 (control) neurons from 3 mice per genotype. Scale bars = 100 µm (A&C), 20 µm (B&D), 50 µm (E-H).