Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 Feb 2;48(SUP1):S146–S154. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1270832

Table 2.

Tests of the mediational effect of emotion regulation (ER, time t) in the prediction from treatment group (SNAP, time t - 1) to irritability (IRR, time t + 1).

Effect Path B SE f2 (ES) p 95% Conf. Int.
Model 1
 SNAP on
 IRR (direct) c −0.35 0.29 0.01 0.24 −0.92 0.23
Model 2
 SNAP on ER a 1.48 0.51 0.06 0.004** 0.48 2.49
Model 3
ER on IRR b −0.12 0.03 0.37 <0.001*** −0.16 −0.07
 SNAP on
 IRR (indirect) c’ −0.18 0.28 <0.01 0.51 −0.73 0.36

Note. ES indicates effect size measured using Cohen’s f2, where f2 ≥ .02 denotes a small effect, ≥ .15 a medium effect, and ≥ .35 a large effect.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001