Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;12:885. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00885

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Preservation of fluorescence after resin embedding. (A) The VIP::tdTomato samples in normal and optimized GMA resin (scale bar: 30 μm). (B) Fluorescent protein preservation ratio and the background fluorescence rising rate after embedding (n = 30, 29, 36, 36 from left to right). Error bars represent SD. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests (∗∗∗∗p < 0.001). (C) Fine structures were clearly detected with the optimized embedding method (scale bar in the first two columns: 20 μm; Scale bar in the last column: 50 μm).