Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;4(4):367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.007

Table 10.

Effect of dietary inclusion of an organic acids-based formulation (OABF) and avilamycin dietary inclusion on the volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and molar ratios in the ileal digesta of 42-day-old broilers.

Item Total VFA1, mmol/kg of wet ileal digesta Acetic, % Propionic, % Butyric, % Other VFA2, % Branched VFA3, %
Main effect
OABF4 No 8.17 69.88 3.91 15.23 6.38 4.62
Yes 9.05 73.65 3.62 12.46 5.59 4.68
Avilamycin5 No 8.63 75.63 3.49 11.17 5.74 3.98
Yes 8.59 67.91 4.04 16.52 6.23 5.32
Treatments6
CON 7.79 73.61 3.60 12.34 6.51 3.94
OA 9.48 77.64 3.38 10.00 4.96 4.03
OAAV 8.63 69.66 3.86 14.93 6.23 5.34
AV 8.55 66.15 4.21 18.11 6.24 5.30
Statistics
SEM7 0.800 3.160 0.511 1.940 0.714 0.731
PO 0.280 0.243 0.578 0.166 0.283 0.932
PA 0.957 0.021 0.291 0.010 0.495 0.078
PO×A 0.322 0.936 0.904 0.828 0.291 0.973
1

Total VFA = acetic + propionic + butyric + branched VFA + other VFA.

2

Οther VFA = valeric + caproic + heptanoic.

3

Βranched VFA = isobutyric + isovaleric + isocaproic.

4

No: no OABF addition; Yes: addition of 1 g OABF/kg diet.

5

No: no avilamycin addition; Yes: addition of 2.5 mg of avilamycin/kg diet.

6

Interaction means from 8 replicate pens per treatment. Treatments include: control – no additions (CON), 1 g OABF/kg diet (OA), avilamycin 2.5 mg active components/kg diet (AV) and combination of OA + AV (OAAV).

7

Pooled standard error of means.