Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;4(4):367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.007

Table 11.

Effect of dietary inclusion of an organic acids-based formulation (OABF) and avilamycin dietary inclusion on the volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and molar ratios in the cecal digesta of 42-day-old broilers.

Item Total VFA1, mmol/kg of wet
cecal digesta
Acetic, % Propionic, % Butyric, % Other VFA2, % Branched VFA3, %
Main effect
OABF4 No 112.44 62.23 9.28 23.50 2.04 2.94
Yes 102.36 62.25 9.08 23.13 2.32 3.21
Avilamycin5 No 112.41 62.04 9.73 23.08 2.04 3.09
Yes 102.39 62.44 8.64 23.54 2.33 3.06
Treatments6
CON 110.80 63.03 9.09 22.66 2.03 3.19
OA 114.01 61.06 10.36 23.50 2.05 3.00
OAAV 90.70 63.44 7.80 22.75 2.59 3.43
AV 114.09 61.44 9.48 24.34 2.06 2.70
Statistics
SEM7 9.467 1.247 0.783 1.870 0.136 0.406
PO 0.296 0.988 0.800 0.843 0.052 0.513
PA 0.299 0.755 0.176 0.806 0.043 0.939
PO×A 0.171 0.123 0.070 0.522 0.076 0.270
1

Total VFA = acetic + propionic + butyric + branched VFA + other VFA.

2

Οther VFA = valeric + caproic + heptanoic.

3

Βranched VFA = isobutyric + isovaleric + isocaproic.

4

No: no OABF addition; Yes: addition of 1 g OABF/kg diet.

5

No: no avilamycin addition; Yes: addition of 2.5 mg of avilamycin/kg diet.

6

Interaction means from 8 replicate pens per treatment. Treatments include: control – no additions (CON), 1 g OABF/kg diet (OA), avilamycin 2.5 mg active components/kg diet (AV) and combination of OA + AV (OAAV).

7

Pooled standard error of means.