Table 1.
Author | Sample size (n) | Gender ratio (male : female) | Age (range) | Measurement method | Study type | Quality rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ackland et al. (2008) | 8 | 4 : 04 | 87 (81–98) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 11 |
Adams et al. (2007) | 1 | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 6 | ||
De Wilde et al. (2002) | 65 | Geometric | In vitro | 9 | ||
Garner & Pandy (2001) | 1 | 1 : 00 | 25 | Geometric | In vitro | 7 |
Graichen et al. (2001) | 10 | 4 : 06 | (22–34) | Geometric | In vivo | 11 |
Greiner et al. (2013) | 7 | 74 (61–82) | Geometric | In vitro | 11 | |
Hamilton et al. (2013) | 1 | Geometric | In vitro | 5 | ||
Hamilton et al. (2015) | 1 | Geometric | In vitro | 7 | ||
Herrmann et al. (2011) | 7 | 77 (63–84) | Geometric | In vitro | 8 | |
Howell et al. (1986) | 10 | 10 : 00 | Geometric | In vivo | 8 | |
Hughes et al. (1998) | 10 | 5 : 05 | (40–89) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 12 |
Kuechle et al. (1997) | 12 | 59 (33–80) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 10 | |
Kuechle et al. (2000) | 12 | 59 (33–80) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 8 | |
Liu et al. (1997) | 10 | 4 : 05 | 67 (40–89) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 11 |
Liu et al. (1998) | 10 | 4 : 05 | 67 (40–89) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 11 |
Nakajima et al. (1999) | 10 | 4 : 05 | 67 (40–89) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 11 |
Otis et al. (1994) | 10 | (70–80) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 7 | |
Poppen & Walker (1978) | 37 | Geometric | In vivo | 8 | ||
Schwartz et al. (2013) | 8 | 6 : 02 | (46–68) | Tendon excursion | In vitro | 9 |
Walker et al. (2016) | 12 | Geometric | In vivo | 9 |