Table 2.

Comparison through Fault Detection Rate. Best results of Xiao et al., 2016 is adopted.

Ref.	Mahadevan and Shah, 2009					Xiao et al, 2016	Yin et al, 2014	This Study
Fault	PCA-T2	PCA-Q	DPCA-T2	DPCA-Q	1-class SVM	1-class SVM	2-class SVM	2-class SVM
1	99.20	99.80	99.40	99.50	99.80	99.50	99.50	99.90
2	98.00	98.60	98.10	98.50	98.60	98.30	98.12	98.10
4	4.40	96.20	6.10	100.00	99.60	47.40	99.88	100.00
5	22.50	25.40	24.20	25.20	100.00	45.20	90.75	100.00
6	98.90	100.00	98.70	100.00	100.00	99.20	60.13	100.00
7	91.50	100.00	84.10	100.00	100.00	70.10	98.91	100.00
8	96.60	97.60	97.20	97.50	97.90	97.40	96.00	99.38
10	33.40	34.10	42.00	33.50	87.60	68.00	81.00	98.25
11	20.60	64.40	19.90	80.70	69.80	65.80	80.25	96.62
12	97.10	97.50	99.00	97.60	99.90	98.80	97.75	100.00
13	94.00	95.50	95.10	95.10	95.50	95.00	92.50	95.00
14	84.20	100.00	93.90	100.00	100.00	93.90	91.00	100.00
16	16.60	24.50	21.70	29.20	89.80	73.10	89.38	100.00
17	74.10	89.20	76.00	94.70	95.30	75.20	81.63	97.62
18	88.70	89.90	88.90	90.00	90.00	89.30	89.50	90.38
19	0.40	12.70	0.70	24.70	83.90	43.60	85.88	100.00
20	29.90	45.00	35.60	51.00	90.00	69.00	80.50	100.00
21	26.40	43.00	35.60	44.20	52.80	59.40	-	100.00