Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jun 7;47(10):2181–2205. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0862-1

Table 2.

Characteristics of Latent Subtypes by Indicators

Filipino Americans Korean Americans

Class 1
High Assimilation w/Ethnic Identity
Class 2
Integrated Bicultural w/Strongest Ethnic Identity
Class 3
Modest Bicultural w/Strong Ethnic Identity
Significant Differences at p<0.05 Class 1
Separation
Class 2
Integrated Bicultural
Class 3
Modest Bicultural w/Strong Ethnic Identity
Significant Differences at p<0.05 Ethnic Group Diff p<0.05
Proportion (%)
Sample size (n)
100%
n=379
45.4%
n=172
44.3%
n=168
10.3%
n=39
100%
n=410
7.6%
n=31
74.4%
n=305
18.0%
n=74

Heritage Language 2.55 1.73 3.27 3.14 1<2, 1<3 3.35 4.10 3.24 3.52 1>2, 1>3, 2<3 FA<KA1
English 4.84 4.97 4.94 3.85 1>3, 2>3 4.59 3.02 4.92 3.93 1<2, 1<3, 2>3 FA>KA
Heritage Culture 2.68 2.13 3.17 3.01 1<2, 1<3 2.94 3.64 2.85 3.03 1>2, 1>3 FA<KA
Host Culture 4.27 4.46 4.16 3.89 1>2, 1>3, 2>3 3.9 2.93 4.05 3.72 1<2, 1<3, 2>3 FA>KA
Ethnic Identity 4.35 4.02 4.69 4.42 1<2, 1<3, 2>3 4.15 4.07 4.16 4.15 FA>KA
American Identity 3.86 4.15 3.71 3.23 1>2, 1>3, 2>3 3.53 2.46 3.76 3.10 1<2, 1<3, 2>3 FA>KA

Note:

1

FA means Filipino Americans, KA means Korean Americans