Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;9:5245. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07700-1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Predicted binding mode of dapagliflozin to hSGLT1 and hSGLT2. Dapagliflozin (orange/red) adopts a similar pose to phlorizin (transparent green/red) in both hSGLT1 (a) and hSGLT2 (b). Interactions in the sugar binding site and extracellular vestibule are preserved including the electrostatic interaction with R267 (hSGLT1) and the aromatic cage formed by H80, F98, and H268 (hSGLT2). c αMDG hSGLT1 D268H (black squares) sugar currents. αMDG currents were measured at Vm = −50mV. The red dashed curve is a representative, wild-type hSGLT1 response. For the D268H mutant K0.5 = 1.2 ± 0.1 mM, while wild-type hSGLT1 K0.5 = 0.9 ± 0.1 mM. For c and d, data are normalized to the current measured at 10 mM αMDG. d Na+ dependence of αMDG currents measured in 10 mM αMDG at Vm = −50mV. For hSGLT1 D268H K0.5 = 17 ± 1.2 mM and for wild-type hSGLT1 K0.5 = 36 ± 1 mM. Hill coefficients hSGLT1 D268H and wild-type were 1.62 ± 0.03 and 1.61 ± 0.1. e Phlorizin and f dapagliflozin effect on the Qmax for hSGLT1 D268H, we estimated a Ki = 0.3 ± 0.1 and 0.035 ± 0.011 µM for phlorizin and dapagliflozin, respectively, while the wild-type Ki = 0.22 ± 0.04 and 0.45 ± 0.02 µM. For cf, each data point is the mean ± SEM of n ≥ 5 oocytes