Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;8:269. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0328-y

Table 1.

Comparison of age groups on variables of interest

Age group Full group (n = 47) Young adults (n = 23) Middle-aged adults (n = 24) T, p
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
Age 41.11 (15.47) 25.78 (2.61) 55.79 (3.53) −33.05, <0.001
Sex (% male) 51.1 56.5 45.8 0.54, 0.46a
FE-PE2I VS BPND 2.29 (0.48) 2.62 (0.45) 1.98 (0.25) 6.05, <0.001
FE-PE2I caudate BPND 2.02 (0.54) 2.40 (0.40) 1.65 (0.41) 6.30, <0.001
FE-PE2I putamen BPND 3.26 (0.44) 3.54 (0.40) 2.99 (0.27) 5.57, <0.001
BIS Total 58.28 (10.74) 57.30 (9.37) 59.21 (12.04) −0.60, 0.55
BIS Motor 21.57 (3.80) 21.13 (3.57) 22.00 (4.04) −0.78, 0.44
BIS Attention 15.49 (3.85) 15.65 (3.42) 15.33 (4.29) 0.28, 0.78
BIS Nonplanning 21.21 (4.68) 20.52 (4.13) 21.88 (5.15) −0.99, 0.33
TPQ-NS Total 13.26 (5.00) 14.09 (3.85) 12.46 (5.88) 1.13, 0.27
NS1 5.06 (1.97) 5.26 (1.79) 4.88 (2.15) 0.67, 0.51
NS2 2.11 (1.89) 2.00 (1.83) 2.21 (1.98) −0.37, 0.71
NS3 2.62 (1.42) 2.87 (1.25) 2.38 (1.56) 1.20, 0.24
NS4 3.47 (1.73) 3.96 (1.55) 3.00 (1.79) 1.95, 0.57

We found significant differences in FE-PE2I BPND between age groups. There was no difference in sex distribution or in BIS-11 and TPQ-NS Scores across age groups

SD standard deviation

aResult of Chi-Square test (df = 1)