Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;18:192. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0751-0

Table 2.

Comparison of primary outcomes of EBUS-TBNA procedures

EBUS-TBNA procedure The primary outcome Pa value
Specimen adequacy rate
suction–stylet vs. suction–no stylet 87.1% vs. 88.2% 0.629
suction–stylet vs. stylet–no suction 87.1% vs. 85.6% 0.728
Diagnostic yield
suction–stylet vs. suction–no stylet 32.2% vs. 31.8% >  0.999
suction–stylet vs. stylet–no suction 32.2% vs. 31.0% 0.711

a: Determined by McNemar test; EBUS-TBNA Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration