Table 2.
Comparison of primary outcomes of EBUS-TBNA procedures
| EBUS-TBNA procedure | The primary outcome | Pa value |
|---|---|---|
| Specimen adequacy rate | ||
| suction–stylet vs. suction–no stylet | 87.1% vs. 88.2% | 0.629 |
| suction–stylet vs. stylet–no suction | 87.1% vs. 85.6% | 0.728 |
| Diagnostic yield | ||
| suction–stylet vs. suction–no stylet | 32.2% vs. 31.8% | > 0.999 |
| suction–stylet vs. stylet–no suction | 32.2% vs. 31.0% | 0.711 |
a: Determined by McNemar test; EBUS-TBNA Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration