Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;13(3):677–681. doi: 10.1111/eip.12690

Table 2.

Importance attached by senior early psychosis staff members to each component of the coordinated specialty care model

Item Level of evidence-base Level of importance (n=25)
Extremely Important Important Equivocal Less important Un-important

Population-level interventions and access
* First appointment within 2 weeks D 84% 16% - - -
 Targeted education to “first contact” services in the community B 64% 36% - - -
 communication between FEP & inpatient services D 64% 32% - 4% -
Comprehensive assessments and care plan
* comprehensive clinical assessment at intake C 92% 8% - - -
* Create individual treatment plan following assessment C 88% 12% - - -
 Psychosocial needs are incorporated into care plan C 72% 24% 4% - -
 Seek collateral information from family C 76% 24% - - -
Pharmacotherapy
 Antipsychotic medication provided A 52% 32% 16% - -
 Medication decision based on standardized algorithm - 40% 32% 16% 4% 8%
 Clozapine offered after two unsuccessful trials of APs A 24% 32% 16% 16% 12%
 Guided AP dose reduction after 1 year of remission - 20% 48% 16% 8% 8%
 Structured intervention to prevent weight gain B 4% 48% 24% 16% 8%
Psychoeducation & Psychotherapy
 Client-focused psyched or illness management training B 60% 24% 16% - -
 CBT for symptoms of psychosis, anxiety or depression B 60% 36% - - 4%
 Caregiver education and support A/B 60% 28% 8% 4% -
 Social & community skills training B 48% 40% 8% 4% -
Addictions treatment
 MET or CBT for co-morbid substance use C 48% 40% 8% 4% -
Vocational and Educational support
 Supported employment services A 56% 32% 8% - 4%
Service system and models of intervention
* At least Masters level Team Leader - 88% 11% - - -
* Providing crisis intervention or linkage to crisis services C 88% 8% 4% - -
* Regular multidisciplinary team meetings B 88% 8% - 4% -
 Multidisciplinary team of qualified professionals - 80% 16% - 4% -
 Case manager assigned for ongoing care C 80% 16% - 4% -
 Psychiatrists assigned to specific clients C 76% 24% - - -
 Psychiatrist integrated into the team C 68% 24% - 4% 4%
 Proactive outreach and engagement for clients C 60% 24% 12% - 4%
 Explicit admission criteria B 56% 24% 20% - -
 ratio of active FEP clients to clinicians 20:1 C 48% 44% 4% 4% -
 Clearly identified population served - 48% 40% 8% - 4%
 Mandate to provide services for specified time B 36% 36% 20% - 8%
Evaluation and quality improvement
 Formal annual assessment conducted C 64% 24% 12% - -

Key: AP: Antipsychotic; CBT: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; FEP: First Episode Psychosis; MET: Motivational Enhancement Therapy.

Level of evidence base as determined in the Addington et al., 2013 review of essential EP program components. A= strong evidence, B= Supportive evidence, C=opinion, D= No evidence of benefit or harm.

Defined as ratio of 1:25 in Addington et al., 2013 study.

*

Denotes components that were deemed as “extremely important” by at over 80% of participants.