Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 14;52(4):399–412. doi: 10.2478/raon-2018-0036

Table 2.

The main results by their predictors. Intention-to-screen response rates, the mean age of responders and histological outcomes are presented as absolute numbers, proportions (per 100 or 1.000) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by the study group, the region of residence and the level of protection

Number of women Intention to screen response rate per 100 (%) with 95% CI Mean age (95% CI) of responders Intetion to screen histology outcome
HSIL/CIN2+ HSIL/CIN3+


no. per 1000 (‰) with 95% CI no. per 1000 (‰) with 95% CI
ALL WOMEN All women 26,556 33.8% (33.2%.34.4%) 49.0 (48.7-49.2) 94 3.5‰ (2.9‰–4.4‰) 71 2.7‰ (2.1‰–3.4‰)
Responders 8,972
STUDY GROUPS I1 opt-in all 14,400 34.0% (33.2%–34.8%) 49.0 (48.7-49.3) 49 3.4‰ (2.5‰–4.5‰) 36 2.5‰ (1.8‰–3.5‰)
responders 4,896

I2 opt-out all 9,556 37.7% (36.7%–38.6%) 49.0 (48.6-49.3) 37 3.9‰ (2.8‰–5.4‰) 30 3.1‰ (2.2‰–4.5‰)
responders 3,598

P control all 2,600 18.4% (16.9%–19.9%) 48.0 (47.2-48.9) 8 3.1‰ (1.4‰–6.3‰) 5 1.9‰ (0.7‰–4.8‰))
responders 478




p-value < 0.000 0.766 0.557
REGION Celje all 11,055 33.2% (32.3%–34.0%) 48.3 (47.9-48.6) 38 3.4‰ (2.5‰–4.8‰) 28 2.5‰ (1.7‰–3.7‰)
responders 3,666

Maribor all 15,501 34.2% (33.5%–35.0%) 49.4 (49.2-49.7) 56 3.6‰ (2.8‰–4.7‰) 43 2.8‰ (2.0‰–3.8‰)
responders 5,306



p-value 0.070 0.813 0.708
LEVEL OF PROTECTION Medium all 12,464 51.1% (50.2%–52.0%) 48.4 (48.2-48.7) 48 3.9‰ (2.9‰–5.1‰) 33 2.6‰ (1.9‰–3.8‰)
responders 6,367

No/low all 14,092 18.5% (17.8%–19.1%) 51.1 (50.9-51.3) 46 3.3‰ (2.4‰–4.4‰) 38 2.7‰ (1.9‰–3.7‰)
responders 2,605



p-value < 0.000 0.422 0.838

Statistically significant result at α = 0.05.