Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 1;4(4):505–509. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2018.07.010

Table 3.

Simple regression and correlation analyses to predict PROMIS physical function from TUG, NPRS, BMI, and smoking status.

Variables Parameter estimate (βˆ) 95% CI Simple correlation (r) 95% CI P value
TUG—PROMIS (n = 60) −0.42 (−0.64 to −0.19) −0.43 (−0.62 to −0.20) ≤.0005
NPRS—PROMIS (n = 60) −0.88 (−1.63 to −0.13) −0.30 (−0.51 to −0.05) ≤.0217
BMI—PROMIS (n = 58) −0.41 (−0.75 to −0.07) −0.31 (−0.52 to −0.05) ≤.0183
Smoking status—PROMIS (nN = 32, nQ = 23, nC = 8) N: 40.07 (37.39-42.75); Q vs N: −1.11 (−5.23 to 3.01); C vs N: −4.94 (−10.79 to 0.09) ≤.2467

CI, confidence interval; Smoking Status: N, never smoked; Q, quit smoking; C, current smoker.

Smoking Status was analyzed using an indicator variable parameterization with N = never smoked as the reference category.