TABLE 5.
Degree of Tibial Tunnel Enlargement at 1 Year After ACL Reconstructiona
| Group R | Group P | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AM | |||
| OC | 1.7 ± 12.6 | 1.1 ± 9.4 | .1259 |
| OS | 0.7 ± 10.2 | –3.8 ± 10.2 | .1019 |
| OA | 3.6 ± 9.6 | 4.6 ± 15.2 | .0957 |
| Area | 1.5 ± 28.4 | –4.8 ± 19.0 | .2838 |
| PL | |||
| OC | 0.8 ± 16.9 | –3.1 ± 12.5 | .1693 |
| OS | –2.9 ± 15.3 | –4.3 ± 10.2 | .1529 |
| OA | –2.0 ± 15.8 | –1.4 ± 13.8 | .1583 |
| Area | –6.5 ± 39.2 | –14.1 ± 26.6 | .3918 |
aData are shown as mean ± SD in percentages. Values are the percentage change compared with the tunnel diameter and the cross-sectional area measured at the 2-week period. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; AM, anteromedial; OA, oblique axial; OC, oblique coronal; OS, oblique sagittal; PL, posterolateral.