Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;8(1):e1483303. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1483303

Table 3.

Selected SNPs significantly associated with aggressiveness risk in MDACC-PCa patient cohort and reclassification risk in AS cohort.

        MDACC-PCa patient cohort (N = 1762)
AS Cohort (N = 393)
        GS≥8 vs. GS≤6
Risk of reclassification
Gene name SNP location Model OR (95% CI)b P value HR (95% CI)d P value
PSMB8 rs16871026 Intron DOM 3.52 (1.40–8.84) 0.007 2.68 (1.28–5.59) 0.009
NFATC2 rs75164249 Intron DOM 1.74 (1.06–2.85) 0.029 1.60 (1.02–2.52) 0.041
NFATC2 rs55990504a Intron DOM 1.68 (1.00–2.84) 0.050 1.74 (1.09–2.78) 0.020
PSMD11
rs4132610
Intron
ADD
1.34 (1.00–1.81)
0.050
1.32 (1.00–1.74)
0.047
        D’Amico high vs. low
Risk of reclassification
Gene name
SNP
location
Model
OR (95% CI)c
P value
HR (95% CI)d
P value
ITGAL rs3087438 Intron DOM 0.68 (0.49–0.95) 0.025 0.65 (0.45–0.95) 0.027
PIK3R1 rs34309 Intron REC 1.63 (1.05–2.52) 0.030 1.84 (1.13–3.00) 0.014
PSMD3 rs4065321 Intron DOM 0.69 (0.49–0.98) 0.037 0.66 (0.44–0.99) 0.045
PSMD3 rs12453334 Intron REC 1.59 (1.00–2.51) 0.046 1.74 (1.04–2.89) 0.034

aSNP in linkage disequilibrium (r= 0.81) with rs75164249.

bThe model was adjusted with age, clinical T stage and PSA levels at diagnosis.

cThe Models adjusted for age and PSA level at diagnosis.

dThe model was adjusted for age, GS score, clinical T stage and PSA levels at diagnosis.