Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208725

Table 1. General characteristics of the enrolled studies.

Author Year Country Study design Number Intervention Age Weight / BMI Duration of prevention
Treatment Comparator Treatment Comparator Treatment Comparator
Burrows RF[13] 2001 Australia RCT 76 dalteparin 2500 IU
(n = 39)
Saline
(n = 37)
31.7±4.8 31.3±5.5 81.7[17.2] 79.9[14.0] 5 days
Ellison J[14] 2001 United Kingdom RCT 30* enoxaparin 4000 IU
(n = 10)
tinzaparin 50 IU/kg
(n = 10)
dalteparin 5000 IU
(n = 10)
NR 26(18–35)
27(16–42)
28(16–40)
NR BMI
28.2(22–41)
29.5(21–40.7)
27.8(23–39)
NR 5 days
Farjah A[15] 2012 K.S.A. RCT 300 tinzaparin 4500 IU
(n = 100)
Placebo
(n = 200)
28.6 (18–35) 28.6 (18–35) NR NR 14 days
Gates S[16] 2004 United Kingdom RCT 141 enoxaparin 40 mg
(n = 70)
saline
(n = 71)
31.3±5.8 30.6±5.4 ≥80 kg, 29% ≥80 kg, 30% 14 days
Gibson J L[17] 1998 United Kingdom RCT 17* enoxaparin 20 mg
(n = 6)
enoxaparin 40 mg
(n = 5)
UFH 7500IU ×2
(n = 6)
NR NR NR NR NR
Gizzo S[19] 2014 Italy Prospective Cohort 529 enoxaparin 4000 UI or dalteparin 5000 UI
(n = 349)
no treatment
(n = 180)
38.07±2.58 38.3±2.77 BMI
27.14±2.16
BMI
27.48±1.93
7 days
Heilmann L[18] 2007 Germany RCT 150 dalteparin 5000 U
(n = 50)
UFH 5000 IU×2
(n = 50)
no treatment
(n = 50)
28±6
29±5
28±3 BMI
23±4
23±2
BMI
20±7
7 days

Abbreviations: *, in addition to CS, there was at least one additional risk factor for thrombosis