Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2018 May 7;29(8):1650–1664. doi: 10.1007/s13361-018-1977-z

Table 3.

Comparison of LC-MS and DMS-MS shows a factor of 7.5–30 increase in throughput using SPE-DMS-MS, with SCX-SPE assumed to be performed in batch mode. UPLC and nanoLC timings include time for two blank runs. DMS-MS timing is for our prototype system and includes 10 s to generate a stable ESI signal; 6 s data acquisition per marker, 42 s in total; 60 s for cleaning the sample transfer line. The sample preparation timing in this table is based on a batch of approximately 20 samples of the type used in this study.

Analysis platform LC-MS DMS-MS
Sample preparation Protein precipitation.
15–25 min for all samples
Solid phase extraction (SPE)
1–2 hrs for all samples
Sample volume for single analysis 100 μL 40 μL
Detection on mass spec/sample UPLC: 15–30 min [3]
NanoLC: 60 min [27]
~2 min
Daily throughput on mass spec/day (24 hrs) UPLC: 48–96 samples
NanoLC: 24 samples
~720 samples