Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;7:e40675. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40675

Figure 3. Absolute errors of four mouse DNAm clocks applied to untreated wild-type samples.

(A) In this case, WLMT clock was applied to its test set, whereas for the other age predictors this set also included their training set samples. (B) Blood samples which were not used in any of the clocks. (C) Only liver samples. (D) Samples of all tissues, excluding those used in the YOMT clock. (E) Samples of all non-blood tissues. (F) All tissues, excluding liver.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Performance of the WLMT, blood, YOMT and liver clocks on the liver samples not included into the WLMT and liver training sets.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

∆Age shows difference between DNAm age and chronological age. Chronological age of the included samples is 180 days. MAE is 244 days for the WLMT and 65 days for the liver clock.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. Performance of the WLMT, blood, YOMT and liver clocks.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

WLMT: only test samples are included. YOMT: test and training sets are shown. Blood samples have not been used in development of this clock. Blood clock: all blood samples belong to the training set, while all other tissues to the test set. Liver clock: only test samples are shown.