Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;7(6):724–730. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.10.06

Table 1. Specific challenges with TMVR.

Domain TAVR TMVR
Epidemiology Single: degenerative sclerotic AS Complex: non-rheumatic DMR & ischemic FMR
Existing gold-standard of treatment SAVR; TAVR accomplishes the same thing Mostly mitral valve repair; TMVR equivalent of surgical replacement only
Unmet need & high-risk patients Common Uncommon in overall MR population
Durability of bioprosthetic valve Good in aortic position Poor in mitral position
Impact of suboptimal results (PVL, PPM, risk of obstruction) Low (in older patients; higher in younger patients) High (generally younger patients; LVOT obstruction; systolic pressure gradient)
Heterogeneity of substrate for implant Low High
Other pathologies that need to be addressed Uncommon Common (Afib, TR)
Trial enrollment & progress Fast (prohibitive risk: previously untreated population) Slow (strict inclusion criteria; uncommon demographic; competing devices)

TMVR, transcatheter mitral valve replacement; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; DMR, degenerative mitral valve regurgitation; FMR, functional mitral regurgitation; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; PVL, paravalvular leak; PPM, permanent pacemaker; LVOT, left ventricular outflow track; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.