Table 1. Specific challenges with TMVR.
| Domain | TAVR | TMVR |
|---|---|---|
| Epidemiology | Single: degenerative sclerotic AS | Complex: non-rheumatic DMR & ischemic FMR |
| Existing gold-standard of treatment | SAVR; TAVR accomplishes the same thing | Mostly mitral valve repair; TMVR equivalent of surgical replacement only |
| Unmet need & high-risk patients | Common | Uncommon in overall MR population |
| Durability of bioprosthetic valve | Good in aortic position | Poor in mitral position |
| Impact of suboptimal results (PVL, PPM, risk of obstruction) | Low (in older patients; higher in younger patients) | High (generally younger patients; LVOT obstruction; systolic pressure gradient) |
| Heterogeneity of substrate for implant | Low | High |
| Other pathologies that need to be addressed | Uncommon | Common (Afib, TR) |
| Trial enrollment & progress | Fast (prohibitive risk: previously untreated population) | Slow (strict inclusion criteria; uncommon demographic; competing devices) |
TMVR, transcatheter mitral valve replacement; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; DMR, degenerative mitral valve regurgitation; FMR, functional mitral regurgitation; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; PVL, paravalvular leak; PPM, permanent pacemaker; LVOT, left ventricular outflow track; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.