Table 3.
Regions tested for their effect on intraspecies and interspecies differences in cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) within and between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans are compared to a previous study (Laturney and Moehring 2012) that mapped the same regions for interspecies mate preference
Deficiencya | Intraspecies female CHCsb | Interspecies female CHCsb | Interspecies female receptivityc |
---|---|---|---|
Df(3R)ME15 | n-C21, n-C23, n-C25 | – | Yes |
Df(3R)3-4 | 7-P, 23-Br | n-C22 | – |
Df(3R)ED5156 | n-C27, 9-H, 23-Br | – | – |
Df(3R)Exel6144 | 9,13-PD | – | – |
Df(3R)ED5177 | 9-H | 7-T, 5-T | – |
Df(3R)ED5330 | 7,11-ND | 7-P | – |
Df(3R)BSC38 | n-C21 | – | – |
Df(3R)M-Kx1 | n-C25, n-C27, 7-P | – | Yes |
Df(3R)T-32 | n-C22, n-C23, n-C24, n-C25, 7-P, 9-H, 7,11-HD, 29-Br | n-C21, 7-T | – |
Df(3R)ry85 | – | – | – |
Df(3R)ED5644 | 7-P, 9,13-PD | – | – |
Df(3R)ED5664 | 7-T, 7-P | – | – |
Df(3R)BSC471 | n-C21, n-C22, n-C23, 9-H, 7,11-PD, 7,11-HD, 23-Br, 29-Br | 7-T | – |
Df(3R)P115 | 9,13-PD, 25-Br | – | Yes |
Df(3R)DG2 | – | – | – |
Df(3R)ED5780 | 7,11-ND | – | – |
Df(3R)Cha7 | n-C21, n-C22, n-C23, n-C24, 5-T, 7-P, 9-H, 23-Br, 25-Br | 7-T | Yes |
Df(3R)Dl-BX12 | n-C22, n-C24, 31-Br | 5-P | – |
Df(3R)H-B79 | – | 9-T, 7-T, 5-T, 9,13-PD | – |
Df(3R)e-R1 | 7-N | n-C22, n-C23, n-C25, 9-T, 7-T, 5-T, 9-H, 7,11-HD, 23-Br | Yes |
Df(3R)e-GC3 | 9-H, 7,11-PD | – | – |
Df(3R)BSC56 | n-C22, 23-Br | – | – |
Df(3R)BSC137 | – | 6-T, 5-T, 7-P | – |
Df(3R)Exel6196 | – | 7-T, 7-P | – |
Df(3R)ED6187 | – | 7-T | – |
Df(3R)crb87-5 | n-C22 | – | – |
Df(3R)ED6220 | n-C23, n-C25, 5-T, 7,11-HD, 7,11-ND | 7-P, 9,13-PD | – |
Df(3R)Exel6203 | 9,13-PD, 7,11-PD | 7-T, 5-T, 7-P | – |
Df(3R)BSC321 | – | – | – |
Df(3R)Espl3 | – | – | – |
Df(3R)BSC140 | n-C27, 9-H, 9,13-PD | 7-P | – |
Df(3R)Espl3 | - | - | – |
Df(3R)3450 | 7-P, 9-H, 9,13-PD | - | – |
Df(3R)BSC547 | n-C21, 7-T, 9-H | n-C24, 9,13-PD | – |
Df(3R)L127 | 7,11-PD, 23-Br | - | – |
Df(3R)B81 | n-C27, 7-P, 7,11-PD, 23-Br | - | – |
Df(3R)ED50003 | 7-T, 5-T, 7-P, 9,11-PD | 7,11-ND | – |
aOnly those deficiencies that were used in both studies are shown
bCHC compound names that were significantly affected are abbreviated: n-Heneicosane (n-C21); n-Docosane (n-C22); n-Tricosane (n-C23); n-Tetracosane (n-C24); n-Pentacosane (n-C25); n-Heptacosane (n-C27); (Z)-5-Pentacosene (5-P); (Z)-5-Tricosene (5-T); ( + )-6-Tricosene (6-T); (Z)-7-Heptacosene (7-H); (Z)-7-Nonacosene (7-N); (Z)-7-Pentacosene (7-P); (Z)-7-Tricosene (7-T); (Z)-9-Heptacosene (9-H); (Z)-9-Tricosane (9-T); (Z,Z)-7,11-Heptacosadiene (7,11-HD); (Z,Z)-7,11-Nonacosadiene (7,11-ND); (Z,Z)-7,11-Pentacosadiene (7,11-PD); (Z,Z)-9,13-Pentacosadiene (9,13-PD); n-Methyldocosane (23-Br); 2-Methyltetracosane (25-Br); 2-Methyloctacosane (29-Br); 2-Methyltriacontane (31-Br). “-“ means that no CHCs were significantly affected
c“Yes” indicates that a region affects the female’s receptivity towards an interspecies male; “-“ means this behavior was not significantly affected. Note that no regions affected the related trait of a female’s attractiveness, measured as a male’s willingness to court that female