Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 8;4(12):e01019. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01019

Table 1.

Comparison of two optimization methods.

Methods CL CD K
Optimization results 1 0.151 0.0086 17.4787
Optimization results 2 0.1564 0.0084 18.6617