Table 2.
Performances (%) of the pipeline and multi-task learning models. The values presented are the means of 5 runs of each model. The microaveraged P, R, and F1s of all entity or relation types are shown.
| Method | Entity recognition | Relation extraction | ||||
|
|
P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 |
| Pipeline | 85.0 | 83.2 | 84.1 | 69.8 | 62.4 | 65.9 |
| HardMTLa | 85.0 | 84.1 | 84.5 | 70.2 | 63.6 | 66.7 |
| RegMTLb | 84.5 | 84.5 | 84.5 | 66.7 | 63.6 | 65.1 |
| LearnMTLc | 84.5 | 82.8 | 83.6 | 67.2 | 61.5 | 64.2 |
aHardMTL: multi-task learning model for hard parameter sharing
bRegMTL: multi-task learning model for soft parameter sharing based on regularization
cLearnMTL: multi-task learning model for soft parameter sharing based on task relation learning