Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 11;18:1366. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6262-3

Table 3.

Relationship between two night eating habits and metabolic syndrome after 3.9 years (2013–2014). Study undertaken in Okayama

Total
Those with neither habit Those with a single habit of “dinner immediately before bed” (≥3 times per week) Those with a single habit of “snacks after dinner” (≥3 times per week) Those with
both habits
Metabolic syndrome n = 7287
Number of participants 249/4063 120/1758 58/859 51/607
Model 1a 1.00 1.14 (0.90–1.44) 1.12 (0.83–1.51) 1.43 (1.04–1.96)
Model 2b 1.00 1.10 (0.86–1.41) 1.13 (0.83–1.54) 1.33 (0.95–1.86)
Abdominal obesity n = 5780
Number of participants 342/3212 148/1485 87/652 58/431
Model 1 1.00 1.20 (0.97–1.49) 1.18 (0.91–1.52) 1.52 (1.12–2.07)
Model 2 1.00 1.15 (0.92–1.45) 1.19 (0.91–1.55) 1.41 (1.03–1.95)
Model 3c 1.00 1.16 (0.93–1.47) 1.19 (0.91–1.55) 1.42 (1.03–1.97)
Obesity n = 6225
Number of participants 204/3542 128/1489 51/747 63/447
Model 1 1.00 1.32 (1.04–1.68) 1.30 (0.94–1.79) 2.47 (1.82–3.35)
Model 2 1.00 1.31 (1.01–1.69) 1.32 (0.95–1.84) 2.34 (1.69–3.23)
Model 3c 1.00 1.33 (1.02–1.71) 1.32 (0.95–1.84) 2.37 (1.71–3.29)
Hypertension n = 6074
Number of participants 512/3368 252/1431 103/749 80/526
Model 1 1.00 1.04 (0.87–1.23) 0.95 (0.75–1.19) 0.92 (0.71–1.19)
Model 2 1.00 0.97 (0.81–1.17) 0.95 (0.74–1.21) 0.89 (0.68–1.16)
Model 3d 1.00 0.98 (0.82–1.18) 0.92 (0.72–1.17) 0.78 (0.59–1.03)
Dyslipidemia n = 6177
Number of participants 447/3462 239/1450 96/763 102/502
Model 1 1.00 1.16 (0.97–1.39) 1.04 (0.82–1.31) 1.63 (1.28–2.08)
Model 2 1.00 1.20 (0.99–1.45) 1.07 (0.83–1.37) 1.61 (1.25–2.09)
Model 3e 1.00 1.18 (0.97–1.43) 1.03 (0.80–1.33) 1.49 (1.14–1.94)
Hyper triglyceridemia n = 6605
Number of participants 286/3694 176/1535 64/833 71/543
Model 1 1.00 1.21 (0.98–1.49) 1.11 (0.83–1.47) 1.58 (1.19–2.09)
Model 2 1.00 1.15 (0.92–1.42) 1.16 (0.87–1.56) 1.44 (1.07–1.95)
Model 3e 1.00 1.13 (0.91–1.41) 1.11 (0.83–1.49) 1.35 (0.99–1.84)
Low HDL cholesterolemia n = 7750
Number of participants 125/4246 62/1922 27/917 32/665
Model 1 1.00 1.13 (0.82–1.56) 0.99 (0.65–1.52) 1.70 (1.14–2.53)
Model 2 1.00 1.27 (0.91–1.79) 1.07 (0.69–1.67) 1.63 (1.06–2.51)
Model 3e 1.00 1.19 (0.84–1.68) 0.99 (0.64–1.55) 1.36 (0.88–2.11)
Hyperglycemia n = 5717
Number of participants 509/3194 198/1386 106/669 79/468
Model 1 1.00 0.96 (0.80–1.15) 0.97 (0.77–1.22) 1.16 (0.89–1.51)
Model 2 1.00 0.98 (0.81–1.19) 0.92 (0.72–1.18) 1.13 (0.86–1.49)
Model 3f 1.00 0.99 (0.82–1.20) 0.90 (0.70–1.15) 1.06 (0.80–1.40)

Overall analysis was adjusted by sex.

aAdjusted by age

bAdjusted by age, smoking habit (yes, no, missing), alcohol consumption (yes, no), physical activity (yes, no, missing), and breakfast intake (yes, no, missing)

cAdjusted by age, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, physical activity, breakfast intake, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia

dAdjusted by age, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, physical activity, breakfast intake, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and BMI

eAdjusted by age, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, physical activity, breakfast intake, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and BMI

fAdjusted by age, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, physical activity, breakfast intake, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and BMI

HDL, high-density lipoprotein