Table 3.

Variance analysis of borer damage ratio of cry1Ac transgenic sugarcane lines

	Lines	The borer damage percentage (%, Mean ± SE)	Lines	The borer damage percentage (%, Mean ± SE)
Group I	A1	15.00 ± 2.89e	B1	36.67 ± 3.33 c,d
	A2	16.67 ± 1.67e	B2	40.00 ± 0.00 c,d
	A3	11.67 ± 6.01e	B4	33.33 ± 6.67d
	A4	10.00 ± 0.00e	I2	46.67 ± 3.33b,c
	A5	8.33 ± 1.67e	I4	53.33 ± 3.33b
	A6	20.00 ± 5.00e
Control variety	FN15	85.00 ± 2.89a
Group II	D1	31.67 ± 1.67c	K2	36.67 ± 4.41b,c
	D2	33.33 ± 1.67c	K3	43.33 ± 1.67b
	D4	30.00 ± 2.89c	K5	33.33 ± 1.67c
Control variety	ROC22	93.33 ± 3.33a

Note: Lowercase in the column followed by the same letters mean no significant difference at P = 0.05 level to their corresponding receptor variety