Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;16:346. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1720-3

Table 3.

The comparison of left ventricular function between AAβ and no-AAβ group

Characteristic Before PS match p value After PS match p value
AAβ (n = 872) NO-AAβ (n = 1833) AAβ (n = 226) NO-AAβ (n = 452)
LA 3.9 (3.5–4.2) 3.7 (3.4–4.1) < 0.001 3.8 (3.5–4.1) 3.7 (3.5–4.1) 0.88
LVEDD 5.2 (4.9–5.6) 5.2 (4.8–5.6) 0.277 5.2 (4.8–5.5) 5.2 (4.8–5.6) 0.20
EF 0.61 (0.53–0.67) 0.61 (0.52–0.66) 0.029 0.63 (0.55–0.67) 0.61 (0.53–0.66) 0.009
FS 0.33 (0.27–0.37) 0.33 (0.27–0.36) 0.016 0.34 (0.29–0.38) 0.33 (0.27–0.37) 0.004
E/A 0.82 (0.69–1.17) 0.87 (0.72–1.24) < 0.001 0.88 (0.70–1.20) 0.84 (0.70–1.19) 0.37

AAβ ACEI/ARB/β-B, BMI body mass index, LA left atrium, LVEDD left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, EF left ventricular ejection fraction, FS fraction shortening, E/A ratio of early to late ventricular filling velocities

p values for comparisons between the two groups. Significance level was 0.05