Table 1.

Significant Associations Between the Connections of Networks of Interest and Cognitive Performance (Verbal-Numerical Reasoning) and Educational Attainment

Type	Connection	β	Standard Error	t	p	pcorrected	Mean Value of Connection	95% Confidence Interval of Value of Connection
Verbal-Numerical Reasoning
Interhemisphere	Left FPN–right FPN	−.040	0.016	−2.493	1.27 × 102	.018	1.156	1.127	1.185
	Right CON–left CON	−.063	0.016	−3.923	8.89 × 105	6.67 × 104	0.379	0.356	0.402
CON–FPN	Left CON–right FPN	.034	0.016	−2.106	3.52 × 102	.044	−1.359	−1.387	−1.330
	Right CON–left FPN	.043	0.016	−2.714	6.68 × 103	.011	−2.088	−2.122	−2.054
	Left CON–left FPN	.044	0.016	2.732	6.33 × 103	.011	1.043	1.018	1.067
	Right CON–right FPN	.051	0.016	3.200	1.38 × 103	.005	0.648	0.620	0.676
DMN Related	Left CON–DMN	.061	0.016	3.824	1.33 × 104	6.67 × 104	0.675	0.652	0.698
	Right CON–DMN	−.045	0.016	2.797	5.18 × 103	.011	−0.275	−0.300	−0.250
Educational Attainment
CON–FPN	Right CON–right FPN	.086	0.031	2.736	6.24 × 103	.021	0.648	0.620	0.676
DMN Related	Right FPN–DMN	.104	0.031	−3.335	8.59 × 104	.004	−0.710	−0.738	−0.682
	Right CON–DMN	−.149	0.031	4.761	1.99 × 106	1.99 ×105	−0.275	−0.300	−0.250

The values of connections were transformed into strength before conducting the analyses by multiplying the connection values with the signs of their means. This approach was consistent with (28). Mean values and their 95% confidence intervals of connections reported here are the values before being transformed into strength.

CON, cingulo-opercular network; DMN, default mode network; FPN, frontoparietal network.