Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2018 Nov 12;201(12):3587–3603. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701687

Figure 3. Effect of the NIR laser on cultured MCs and keratinocytes.

Figure 3.

A–B, The effect of the NIR laser on MCs. A, Release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the NIR laser treatment was assessed using a ROS-sensitive fluorescence probe H2DCFDA in BMMCs in vitro. The differentiated BMMC culture was treated with the NIR laser at a power of 0.5 W/cm2 for 1–3 minutes. ROS-activated DCF-fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry. B, Fold increase in DCF+ population compared to no laser-treated control was calculated for each experiment. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s HSD tests. n= 6, 8, 12, 7, 6, 6, 6 for no H2DCFDA control, no laser control, CW 1064 nm for 1 minute, CW 1064 nm for 3 minutes, no laser control with NAC, CW 1064 nm for 1 minute with NAC, H2O2-treated positive control groups, respectively. Results were pooled from 3 independent experiments. C–D, The effect of the NIR laser on primary cultured keratinocytes. C, Release of ROS in primary cultured human dermal keratinocytes in response to the CW NIR laser at a power of 0.5 W/cm2 for 1 minute was assessed in vitro as described above. D, Fold increase in DCF+ population compared to no laser-treated control was calculated. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s HSD tests. n= 3 each for no H2DCFDA control, no laser control, CW 1064 nm for 1 minute, no laser control with NAC, CW 1064 nm for 1 minute with NAC, H2O2-treated positive control groups, respectively. Representative data from 2 independent experiments are presented.