Table 3.

Negative binomial models of alcohol, nicotine, and cannabis use disorder symptoms at age 39, predicted by childhood neighborhood factors

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4		Model 5
	RR	95% CI	RR	95% CI	RR	95% CI	RR	95% CI	RR	95% CI
Alcohol
ND	1.03	0.80, 1.32			0.94	0.72, 1.21	0.95	0.69, 1.30	0.90	0.70,1.15
NS			0.74**	0.60, 0.93	0.73**	0.59, 0.92	0.73**	0.58, 0.92	0.58**	0.41,0.82
ND × gender							0.96	0.62, 1.49
NS × gender									1.49	0.95,2.34
Nicotine
ND	1.05	0.86, 1.28			1.01	0.82, 1.25	0.70	0.53, 0.93	0.99	0.81,1.21
NS			0.91	0.77, 1.09	0.92	0.76, 1.11	0.93	0.77, 1.13	1.23	0.92,1.65
ND × gender							1.71**	1.26, 2.34
NS × gender									0.59**	0.42,0.83
Cannabis
ND	0.90	0.65, 1.25			0.86	0.62, 1.20	0.94	0.63, 1.40	0.88	0.63,1.24
NS			0.77	0.59, 1.02	0.76*	0.57, 1.01	0.77*	0.58, 1.02	0.94	0.61,1.46
ND × gender							0.79	0.47, 1.32
NS × gender									0.66	0.39,1.13

Note. Sample sizes: alcohol (n = 599); nicotine (n = 604); cannabis (n = 608). Neighborhood disadvantage and stability measured at age 10. All models adjusted for earlier symptoms of psychopathology; earlier use of alcohol, tobacco, and cannabis; race; socioeconomic status at individual level; and gender. ND = neighborhood disadvantage; NS = neighborhood stability; RR = rate ratio; CI= confidence interval.

^*p < .10.

^**p < .05.