Table 3:

Prevalence Ratios of choosing LARC based on Poisson Regression Models among participants who enrolled in the survey arm of the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative and responded to key attitude, sociodemographic, and behavior measures.

VARIABLES	Model 1 Pregnancy Intentions/Timing	Model 2 Pregnancy Attitudes	Model 3 How Important Is Prevention?	Model 4 Pregnancy Attitudes + Timing
Pregnancy Intentions
2–5 years	Ref. category			Ref. category
Never	1.16***			1.13***
	(1.07– 1.26)			(1.04– 1.23)
5–10 years	1.142***			1.122***
	(1.05– 1.24)			(1.03– 1.22)
Uncertain	1 187***			1.16***
	(1.09– 1.30)			(1.06– 1.27)
Hypothetical		0 97***		0.98**
Pregnancy		(0.95–0.99)		(0.96–0.999)
(10 point change on
VAS)
Importance of			1.004
Pregnancy Prevention			(0.99–1.02)
(10 point change on VAS)1
Observations	3,130	3,130	3,130	3,130

Note: N=3,130, adjusted for race (white respondents have higher LARC uptake than nonwhite respondents, education (+, indicates positive association with LARC uptake at .05 level of higher), parity (+), insurance status (−), sexual identity, enrollment period 3 (+, vs. period 2), and clinic location (negatively associated with LARC uptake for all clinic locations compared to abortion clinic); Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence interval based on robust standard errors;

^***p<0.001,

^**p<0.01,

^*p<0.05;

¹see Table 2