Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov 12;41(6):641–648. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1400594

Table 3.

Multiple regression analyses results predicting pain interference and pain-related catastrophizing from measures of perceived family support and parental/guardian solicitous responding, controlling for age, sex, and average pain intensity.

Step and variable Total R2 R2 change F change β to enter Final β
Criterion variable: Pain Interference
1. Control variables .07 .07 3.73*
    Sex .24* .15
    Age (centered) .08 .02
2. Average pain intensity .41 .34 62.17*** .60*** .55***
3. Predictors .44 .03 3.12*
    Family support (centered) −.18* −.20*
    Solicitous responding (centered) .19* .20*
4. Interactions
    Age X Family Support −.08 −.08
    Age X Solicitous Responding .02 .02
Criterion variable:Pain-Related Catastrophizing
1. Control variables .02 .02 0.83
    Sex .12 .13
    Age (centered) −.03 −.02
2. Average pain intensity .04 .03 2.95 .17 .10
3. Predictors .15 .11 6.84**
    Family support (centered) −.12 −.20
    Solicitous responding (centered) .38** .42***
4. Interactions .22 .07 4.54*
    Age X Family Support −.24* −.24*
    Age X Solicitous Responding −.07 .07
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001