Table 3.
Efficiency of the MACS procedure in reducing mean (± SD) SDF and SDD in patients with < 30 and ≥ 30 SDF in their neat ejaculate (NB individuals highlighted in bold type in Table 2 were excluded)
| SDF < 30% | SDF ≥ 30% | |
|---|---|---|
| SDF NEAT | 18.3 ± 5.8 | 41.4 ± 7.0 |
| SDF MACS− | 8.6 ± 4.5 | 7.1 ± 1.8 |
| % Efficiency | 2.1 X | 5.8 X |
| SDD NEAT | 5.0 ± 2.5 | 11.8 ± 2.3 |
| SDD MACS− | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 0.8 |
| % Efficiency | 2.2 X | 5.6 X |