Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;35(12):2215–2221. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1319-x

Table 3.

Efficiency of the MACS procedure in reducing mean (± SD) SDF and SDD in patients with < 30 and ≥ 30 SDF in their neat ejaculate (NB individuals highlighted in bold type in Table 2 were excluded)

SDF < 30% SDF ≥ 30%
SDF NEAT 18.3 ± 5.8 41.4 ± 7.0
SDF MACS− 8.6 ± 4.5 7.1 ± 1.8
% Efficiency 2.1 X 5.8 X
SDD NEAT 5.0 ± 2.5 11.8 ± 2.3
SDD MACS− 2.2 ± 1.1 2.1 ± 0.8
% Efficiency 2.2 X 5.6 X