TABLE 2.
Regression- and PSM-based estimated associations between birth in an intervention village and adult outcomes1
| Completed secondary | Completed graduate | Ever-married by | Employed/ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| education | education | age 20–25 y | studying | |
| Regression-based estimated | ||||
| association with birth in an | ||||
| intervention village2 | ||||
| Full sample of men and women | 0.09*** (0.04, 0.14) | 0.11*** (0.06, 0.15) | −0.07* (−0.14, 0.00) | 0.08* (−0.01, 0.16) |
| Only men | 0.06** (0.00, 0.12) | 0.12*** (0.06, 0.18) | −0.04 (−0.09, 0.01) | 0.08** (0.01, 0.14) |
| Only women | 0.16*** (0.07, 0.24) | 0.09** (0.01, 0.16) | −0.11* (−0.23, 0.01) | 0.02 (−0.08, 0.13) |
| PSM (Kernel matching)-based | ||||
| estimated association with birth | ||||
| in an intervention village3 | ||||
| Full sample of men and women | 0.09*** (0.04, 0.14) | 0.11*** (0.06, 0.15) | −0.06** (−0.11, −0.01) | 0.05** (0, 0.11) |
| Only men | 0.07** (0.02, 0.13) | 0.12*** (0.06, 0.18) | −0.05* (−0.09, 0) | 0.08** (0.03, 0.12) |
| Only women | 0.16*** (0.08, 0.25) | 0.09** (0.02, 0.16) | −0.11** (−0.21, −0.02) | 0.02 (−0.07, 0.11) |
1The intervention group includes adults born during 1987–1990 in villages where the nutritional supplement was provided; the control group includes adults born during 1987–1990 in the control villages. *P < 0.1, **P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01. PSM, propensity score matching.
2Values are estimated regression coefficients with 95% CIs. Only the coefficients of birth in an intervention village from each regression, and not covariates, are shown.
3Values are PSM-based estimators of the association between birth in an intervention village and outcome variable, along with 95% CIs.