Table 1.

Mechanical properties of bismaleimide and other polymer composite with different fillers.

Polymers	Fillers	Optimal Loading	Remarks	Reference
BMI	NH2-rGO/WS2	0.6 wt %	The flexural and impact strength of the composites increased by 62.6% and 91.3%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	This paper
BMI	GO	0.15 wt %	The flexural and impact strength of the composites increased by 19.82% and 32.48%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	[4]
BMI	MAH-GO	0.1 wt %	The flexural and impact strength of the composites increased by 37.48% and 77.28%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	[4]
BMI	MPTS-GO	-	The tensile and impact strength of the composites increased by 22.17% and 66.64%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	[8]
BMI	GNS-Fe3O4@PZM	0.4 wt %	The flexural and impact strength of the composites increased by 31.3% and 61.3%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	[16]
BMI	P-POSS-GO	0.8 wt %	The flexural and impact strength of the composites increased by 24.6% and 100.8%, respectively, compared to the neat BMI	[17]
CE/BMI	FGONs	1.0 wt %	The flexural and impact strengths reached optimum values of 110 MPa and 10.98 kJ m−2	[15]
Epoxy	WS2-PEI	0.25 wt %	The fracture toughness increased by 82.98% and flexural strength increased by 65%, compared to the neat EP	[32]
Epoxy	IF-WS2	0.5 wt %	The composite exhibited high shear and peel strength	[33]
Nylon 12	IF-WS2	2 wt %	The tensile strength and bending strength of the composites increased by 27% and 28%, respectively	[34]

BMI, bismaleimide; MAH-GO, maleic anhydride-functionalized GO; MPTS-GO, γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane-functionalized GO; GNS-Fe₃O₄@PZM, reduced graphene oxide-Fe₃O₄@polyphosphazene; P-POSS-GO, phosphorus-containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane-functionalized Graphene oxide; CE, cyanate ester; FGONs,γ-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyltrimethoxysilane-functionalized graphene oxide nanoflakes; WS₂-PEI, branched polyethyleneimine-functionalized WS₂; IF-WS₂, fullerene-like WS₂.