Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;33(12):1219–1228. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0436-2

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Illustrates how a crude natural direct effect estimate of 1.48 and a crude natural indirect effect estimate of 1.05 (the intercept on y-axis) would change under different magnitudes of confounding by a binary unmeasured variable U. The difference between the observed effect and bias-corrected-effect is depicted on the Y-axis, and the difference in prevalence of U between non-smokers and smokers is depicted on the X-axis. The colored lines are a range of plausible values for the effect of U on ischemic stroke. (Color figure online)