Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Oct 30;160(12):2425–2434. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3712-8

Table 3.

Values of selected variables and predicted probabilities of being ruptured based on the statistical model for the IAs illustrated in Fig. 4 and 5. ACOM = anterior communicating artery, ICACAV = cavernous sinus of the internal carotid artery, ICA-OPH = ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery

Case Population Asize [cm] Location NSI OSImax Pred. Prob Rupture Status
a Test 1.0383 ACOM 0.3924 0.3391 0.9121 R
b Training 0.9753 ACOM 0.3471 0.3752 0.8752 R
c Test 1.2542 ACOM 0.3574 0.2705 0.9126 R
d Training 0.9589 ACOM 0.3484 0.2694 0.9122 R
e Test 0.3302 ICA-CAV 0.1871 0.0372 0.0227 U
f Training 0.2965 ICA-CAV 0.2097 0.0373 0.0738 U
g Test 1.6820 ICA-OPH 0.1871 0.4206 0.0154 U
h Training 1.5441 ICA-OPH 0.1947 0.4021 0.0562 U