Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0208603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208603

Table 3. Weibull proportional hazard regression to measure the effects of predictors such as BMI, type of lineages, and HIV on the hazard rate using fluorescein di-acetate conversion time.

Unadjusted Adjusted
Lineages Haz. Ratio p [95% CI] Haz. Ratio p [95% CI]
1 0.95 0.79 0.67–1.34 0.96 0.85 0.64–1.43
2 1.25 0.40 0.73–2.13 1.21 0.51 0.66–2.22
3 0.65 0.14 0.36–1.15 0.57 0.12 0.28–1.16
5 0.96 0.89 0.55–1.67 1.75 0.06 0.95–3.19
6 0.80 0.00 0.67–0.94 0.81 0.02 0.68–0.97
M. bovis 0.49 0.09 0.22–1.11 0.53 0.12 0.23–1.18
HIV positive 0.50 0.00 0.37–0.66 0.47 0.00 0.34–0.64
BMI (day 0) 1.04 0.00 1.02–1.07 1.05 0.00 1.02–1.08
Few AFB
(day 0)
0.48 0.05 0.23–1.00 0.44 0.03 0.21–0.93
Moderate and
Many AFB (day 0)
0.42 0.01 0.20–0.84 0.40 0.01 0.20–0.81

Proportions of smear converted and non-converted per Lineages to estimate the effect of predictors in smear conversion using Fluorescein di-acetate vital staining technique; L = lineage 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; HIV = Human Immunodeficiency Virus; BMI = Body Mass Index; CI = Confidence Interval; p = Probability. L4 is not shown as it is the reference for the others. In addition HIV+ was fitted against HIV-, and AFB smear grade were fitted against smear negative.