Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 15;29(1):195–201. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5508-x

Table 1.

The potential clinical implications of the iuMR errors made by the central and non-central reporters as judged by a Foetal Medicine expert. Implication A means ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was not likely to have changed discussions about prognosis’, implication B – ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was likely to have changed discussions about prognosis, but not about TOP’ and implication C – ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was likely to have changed discussions concerning TOP’. The confidence of the incorrect diagnoses is also shown (High = 70% or 90% certainty, Low = 10%, 30% or 50% certainty)

N (%) Potential clinical relevance Confidence level of diagnosis
A B C High Low
Central 12/316 (3·8%) 8 2 2 11 1
Non-central 28/254 (11·0%) 10 13 5 20 8