Table 1.
The potential clinical implications of the iuMR errors made by the central and non-central reporters as judged by a Foetal Medicine expert. Implication A means ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was not likely to have changed discussions about prognosis’, implication B – ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was likely to have changed discussions about prognosis, but not about TOP’ and implication C – ‘The disagreement in diagnoses was likely to have changed discussions concerning TOP’. The confidence of the incorrect diagnoses is also shown (High = 70% or 90% certainty, Low = 10%, 30% or 50% certainty)
N (%) | Potential clinical relevance | Confidence level of diagnosis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | High | Low | ||
Central | 12/316 (3·8%) | 8 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
Non-central | 28/254 (11·0%) | 10 | 13 | 5 | 20 | 8 |