Table 3.
Trait | QTL | Chr. | Pos. (cM) | S.I. (cM) | P-value | R2∗ | Eff(A) | Eff(B) | Eff(C) | Eff(D) | Eff(E) | Eff(F) | Eff(G) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PM [1–9] | 72.5 | ||||||||||||
QPm.lfl-1A | 1A | 3 | 3–3 | 0.0E+00 | 34.1 | 0.1 | -3.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | |
QPm.lfl-1B | 1B | 142 | 138–146 | 4.1E-05 | 4.5 | -1.5 | -1.8 | -1.4 | -1.2 | -2.4 | -1.2 | -1.8 | |
QPm.lfl-4A | 4A | 162 | 160–169 | 1.2E-08 | 6.6 | -0.1 | -1.2 | -0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | -0.9 | 0.1 | |
QPm.lfl-6B | 6B | 177 | 177–177 | 0.0E+00 | 17.4 | -3.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |
QPm.lfl-7A | 7A | 379 | 375–380 | 0.0E+00 | 18.3 | -0.3 | 0.2 | -2.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 | -0.1 | -0.3 | |
Chromosome (Chr.), position (Pos.), support interval (S.I.), p-value, proportion of phenotypic variance explained (R2), and additive effects (Eff) of the founders Event (A), BAYP4535 (B), Ambition (C), Firl3565 (D), Format (E), Potenzial (F), and Bussard (G) relative to Julius are presented.
∗The explained phenotypic variance of the model fitting all detected QTL simultaneously is presented in bold above the individual R2 values for each QTL.