Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 15;10(11):3635–3649.

Table 1.

Demographic distribution of RRM2B and CypD in breast cancer patients

RRM2B CypD

High (%*) Low p value High (%*) Low p value
Age
    <50 38 (54.3) 32 32 (50.5) 32
    ≥50 59 (64.1) 33 0.205 58 (65.5) 26 0.019
pT stage
    T0-T1 35 (72.9) 13 24 (55.9) 19
    T2-T4 57 (54.8) 47 0.034 62 (63.9) 35 0.364
pN stage
    0 47 (55.3) 38 39 (50.0) 39
    1-2 40 (65.6) 21 42 (77.8) 12
    3 10 (62.5) 6 0.446 9 (56.3) 7 0.004
Grade
    1 = Well 12 (60.0) 8 10 (55.6) 8
    2 = Mod 42 (62.7) 25 37 (58.7) 26
    3 = Poor 38 (57.6) 28 0.834 38 (64.4) 21 0.725
ER
    Negative 28 (51.9) 26 35 (68.6) 16
    Positive 64 (68.1) 30 0.050 46 (54.1) 39 0.095
PR
    Negative 39 (57.4) 29 42 (66.7) 21
    Positive 53 (63.1) 31 0.471 43 (56.6) 33 0.225
HER2
    Negative 63 (58.3) 45 58 (58.0) 42
    Positive 14 (63.6) 8 0.645 14 (63.6) 8 0.627
Ki67
    Negative 31 (48.4) 33 36 (60.0) 24
    Positive 61 (67.8) 29 0.016 51 (62.2) 31 0.791
Molecular subtype
    Luminal A 27 (52.9) 24 27 (56.3) 21
    Luminal B/HER2- 24 (72.7) 9 16 (53.3) 14
    Luminal B/HER2+ 5 (55.6) 4 4 (44.4) 5
    Basal-like TNBC 15 (55.6) 12 18 (75.0) 6
    HER2-positive 7 (77.8) 2 0.091 8 (90.0) 1 0.166
CD44/CD24 status
    CD44+/CD24- 48 (57.8) 35 47 (62.7) 28
    Others 40 (63.5) 23 0.750 35 (60.3) 23 0.792

Note: There are 1, 9, 15, 14, 35, 12 and 1 missing cases in Grade, pT stage, ER, PR, HER2, Ki67 and CD44/CD24 status, respectively. There are 132 cases could be classified on molecular subtype.

*

%represents rate of RRM2-High, which is equal to NHigh/(NHigh+NLow) × 100%.

pT and pN stage are pathological stage.

In this study, no patient has > or = 4 lymph nodes involvement.

p values were based on Pearson Chi square test.