Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 21;42(8):613–629. doi: 10.1177/0146621618762738

Table 5.

Averaged FPR and TPR (%) in Study 3.

FPR
TPR
OR LR MH OR LR MH
Impact = 0
 0% 3.70 4.77 0.00
(3.90) (4.97) (0.00)
 10% 4.48 6.93 0.11 77.67 82.67 21.67
(4.67) (5.48) (0.04) (80.00) (85.00) (23.67)
 20% 4.54 8.25 0.13 71.83 74.67 15.50
(4.17) (5.04) (0.08) (77.17) (84.83) (16.83)
 30% 6.71 13.10 0.19 67.00 63.11 8.44
(4.90) (5.14) (0.19) (77.22) (79.78) (9.56)
 40% 12.59 21.83 0.61 46.67 47.25 4.67
(9.94) (8.88) (0.50) (59.33) (67.58) (4.92)
Impact = 1
 0% 3.93 6.13 3.10
(3.93) (8.93) (2.60)
 10% 4.07 4.89 4.96 70.33 79.67 28.67
(4.11) (7.11) (3.74) (72.00) (83.00) (33.00)
 20% 5.04 7.71 3.67 70.83 71.50 18.83
(4.46) (8.38) (2.33) (75.67) (82.50) (21.50)
 30% 7.19 9.43 1.90 57.78 49.11 10.44
(6.38) (8.09) (1.52) (66.33) (74.22) (13.00)
 40% 12.00 10.78 15.44 45.67 55.00 27.25
(9.94) (49.67) (9.00) (54.25) (84.92) (28.08)

Note. The values in parentheses were obtained with the purification procedure. Inflated FPRs (≥7.5%) are marked in bold. FPR = false positive rate; TPR = true positive rate; OR = odds ratio; LR = logistic regression; MH = Mantel–Haenszel.