Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 12;15:204. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0647-8

Table 3.

Comparison of Women’s Referral Support and Knowledge by Referral Attendance Status

Response N (%)
Attended Referral Did Not Attend Referral p-value
Know other mothers that have had USa 452/510 (88.6) 164/190 (86.3) 0.9199
Baby’s father thinks she should have USa 486/509 (95.5) 183/190 (96.3) 0.6845
Other family members think she should have USa 492/509 (96.7) 179/190 (94.2) 0.0454*
Planned to attend referral visita 493/503 (98.0) 84/186 (45.2) <.0001*
Told the date that she should go to referral hospitala 446/505 (88.3) 163/188 (86.7) 0.0299*
Told where in the hospital to visit firsta 476/505 (94.3) 154/188 (81.9) 0.0002*
Given a card that indicated she should go to the referral hospital, to show at hospitala 486/505 (96.2) 184/188 (97.9) 0.5759
Told who to see at the referral hospitala 444/505 (87.9) 122/186 (65.6) <.0001*
Knew what the process would be once at the hospitala 316/503 (62.8) 115/185 (62.2) 0.0143*
Told that hospital is expecting her arrivala 344/502 (68.5) 103/185 (55.7) 0.0002*

Abbreviation: US ultrasound

aHypotheses test results: p-values calculated from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (General Association statistic)

*Denotes p-value < 0.05