Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 12;15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0758-1

Table 4.

Effects of intervention on hypothesised mediators, at 4 weeks or 4 months, with adjustment for baseline values (coefficients and standard errors from random-effects regressions)

MEDIATOR (range) Four week mediators Six month mediators
n b (SE) p-value n b (SE) p-value
PA self-efficacy(1–5) 597 0·09 (0·08) 0·31
Intentions (1–7) 595 0·29 (0·13) 0·02
Outcome expectations (1–5) 528 −0·03 (0·06) 0·58
Financial motivation (1–7) 600 0·11 (0·15) 0·46
Planning (1–4) 575 0·02 (0·05) 0·75 436 0·08 (0·06) 0·18
Social norms (1–7) 576 0·23 (0·08) < 0·01 434 0·10 (0·12) 0·42
Identified regulation (1–5) 598 0·14 (0·06) 0·01 459 0·11 (0·05) 0·02
Integrated regulation (1–5) 595 0·23 (0·07) < 0·01 454 0·26 (0·08) < 0·01
Intrinsic motivation (1–5) 599 0·18 (0·06) < 0·01 456 0·17 (0·06) < 0·01
Habit (1–5) 448 0·48 (0·12) < 0·01
Workplace norms (1–5) 456 0·13 (0·07) 0·06
Recovery self-efficacy (1–4) 457 0·02 (0·06) 0·80
Maintenance self-efficacy (1–4) 459 −0·02 (0·09) 0·80
Outcome satisfaction (1–5) 427 0·03 (0·05) 0·56

PA Physical activity, SE Standard error

NB. All questionnaire items were scaled so that lower values indicated lower levels of the mediator/outcome. Results are adjusted for strata, season, baseline pedometer steps/day and baseline mediator values with cluster-adjusted standard errors and p-values (b = coefficient for group assignment variable, i.e. Intervention versus Control)