Table 2. Distributiona of Self-Reported Diabetes Mellitus in Adults (≥18 Years) From the Brazilian Capitals and Federal District by Age, Vigitel,b Brazil, 2006–2016.
| Year (n) | Diabetes, % (95% Confidence Interval) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Group, y |
Total | ||||||
| 18–24 | 25–34 | 35–44 | 45–54 | 55–64 | ≥65 | ||
| 2006 (52,796) | 0.9 (0.5–1.3) | 1.1 (0.6–1.7) | 2.9 (2.3–3.6) | 7.1 (6.0–8.2) | 15.7 (13.6–17.8) | 18.9 (17.0–20.8) | 5.5 (5.1–5.9) |
| 2007 (55,824) | 0.7 (0.4–0.9) | 1.7 (1.2–2.1) | 2.9 (2.3–3.4) | 7.7 (6.6–8.8) | 15.8 (13.8–17.8) | 18.9 (17.0–20.9) | 5.8 (5.4–6.2) |
| 2008 (54,353) | 0.6 (0.3–0.9) | 0.9 (0.6–1.2) | 3.4 (2.7–4.2) | 9.0 (7.7–10.4) | 15.7 (13.8–17.6) | 21.2 (19.1–23.3) | 6.2 (5.8–6.6) |
| 2009 (54,367) | 0.7 (0.4–0.9) | 1.9 (1.0–2.7) | 3.3 (2.5–4.0) | 7.4 (6.3–8.5) | 15.3 (13.4–17.2) | 22.5 (20.2–24.7) | 6.3 (5.9–6.8) |
| 2010 (54,339) | 1.3 (0.8–1.8) | 2.2 (1.6–2.8) | 3.4 (2.7–4.0) | 8.1 (7.0–9.2) | 16.4 (14.6–18.3) | 21.9 (19.9–23.8) | 6.8 (6.4–7.2) |
| 2011 (54,144) | 0.5 (0.2–0.7) | 1.1 (0.7–1.4) | 3.3 (2.6–4.0) | 8.7 (7.6–9.8) | 14.8 (13.2–16.5) | 21.4 (19.5–23.3) | 6.3 (5.9–6.7) |
| 2012 (45,448) | 0.9 (0.4–1.3) | 1.6 (1.1–2.1) | 3.9 (3.0–4.9) | 9.3 (8.0–10.6) | 18.5 (16.6–20.4) | 22.9 (20.9–25.0) | 7.4 (6.9–7.8) |
| 2013 (52,929) | 0.8 (0.3–1.3) | 1.2 (0.8–1.6) | 3.6 (2.8–4.4) | 8.5 (7.3–9.7) | 17.1 (15.2–18.9) | 22.1 (20.4–23.8) | 6.9 (6.5–7.3) |
| 2014 (40,853) | 1.0 (0.4–1.6) | 1.6 (1.0–2.1) | 3.9 (3.0–4.9) | 11.5 (9.9–13.0) | 18.2 (16.2–20.1) | 24.4 (22.4–26.5) | 8.0 (7.5–8.5) |
| 2015 (54,174) | 0.9 (0.5–1.2) | 1.4 (0.9–1.9) | 5.0 (3.9–6.1) | 9.2 (7.7–10.7) | 15.8 (14.2–17.5) | 22.6 (20.8–24.3) | 7.4 (6.9–7.9) |
| 2016 (53,210) | 0.9 (0.5–1.4) | 2.0 (1.4–2.6) | 5.2 (4.1–6.3) | 11.0 (9.6–12.4) | 19.6 (17.9–21.2) | 27.2 (25.5–28.9) | 8.9 (8.5–9.4) |
| Coefficientc | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.28 |
| P value | .04 | .51 | <.001 | .004 | .03 | .001 | <.001 |
| SEd | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| R2 e | –0.02 | –0.06 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 0.82 |
a
Adjusted values to match the estimated total population of each city for each of the study years. For more details, see Methods section.
b
Surveillance System of Risk and Protection Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey.
c
Corresponding to the linear regression coefficient value of the indicator on the year of the survey, expressed by percentage points (pp) per year. See Methods section for more details.
d
Standard errors of β regression coefficient. See Methods section for more details.
e
Adjusted R2 corresponding to the linear regression. See Methods section for more details.