Table 4.
Litter composition | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UNIFORM | MIXED | |||||
Birth weight class | ||||||
Item | Light (n = 64) | Heavy (n = 66) | Light (n = 33) | Heavy (n = 41) | Significance2 | |
High consumer | 3 (4.7%) | 12 (18.2%) | 2 (6.1%) | 4 (9.8%) | 0.064 | |
Moderate consumer | 12 (18.7%) | 10 (15.1%) | 3 (9.1%) | 4 (9.8%) | 0.474 | |
Low consumer | 16 (25.0%) | 26 (39.4%) | 7 (21.2%) | 11 (26.8%) | 0.174 | |
Nonconsumer | 33 (51.6%) | 18 (27.3%)a | 21 (63.6%) | 22 (53.6%)b | 0.002 |
Within main treatment comparison (litter composition or birth weight category), counts with different superscripts tended to differ (P = 0.006).
Piglets scoring positive (visually green feces) for all 3 sampling days (i.e., d 19, 21, and 25) were classified as “high consumers.” Piglets having green feces at 2 out of the 3 occasions were categorized as “moderate consumers,” and “low consumers” had green feces at 1 occasion. Nonconsumers were piglets that never scored positive on the sampling days. Data are expressed in absolute numbers and relative (%) to the total number of piglets in each colum.
Data were analyzed with a χ2 test.