Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 10;6:e5901. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5901

Table 7. Bremer (above) and frequency (below) supports resulting from each of the four data conditions.

Discrete (D) Discrete + continuous (DC) Discrete + morphometric (DM) Discrete + continuous + morphometric (DCM)
Number of nodes retained 15 [14] 17 [15] 23 [13] 15 [12] <0.08 [<0.11] Bremer collapsed
Total Bremer support 3.34 [3.25] 3.59 [3.40] 3.86 [3.04] 2.86 [2.59]
Mean Bremer support 0.22 [0.23] 0.21 [0.23] 0.17 [0.23] 0.19 [0.22]
Number of nodes retained 29 30 29 26 <10 Frequency collapsed
Total frequency support 1,337 1,416 1,305 1,207
Mean frequency support 46.10 47.20 45.00 46.42

Note:

Values below which nodes were collapsed, were set as 0.08 and [0.11] for Bremer, and 10 for frequency supports. Largest values in each category are shown in bold.