Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208592

Fig 3. Taxonomic groups showing significant differences (p<0.05) in estimated mean proportions observed between NTH and XBF either by (A) surface gillnet capture or by (B) eDNA approach (12S) during the entire survey.

Fig 3

Order, family and genus levels are detailed. Stars indicate groups that are detected by only one method.